RAGHO PRASAD GUPTA versus SRIKRISHNA PODDAR
The appellant is bound by the decree passed against the benamidar as all contentions that could be advanced by him were pressed by the benamidar and his heirs, who sufficiently represented the appellant; the decree is executable against him under Order 21 Rule 35, CPC and he must vacate the property.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ragho Prasad Gupta; Respondent: Srikrishna Poddar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court in Civil Revision No. 287 of 1963
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Benami Transactions, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Res Judicata, Execution Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ragho Prasad Gupta
Appellant
Srikrishna Poddar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Patna High Court in Civil Revision No. 287 of 1963
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant (real owner) is bound by the decree passed against his benamidar in proceedings under Section 14, Indian Arbitration Act, 1940.
- 2 Whether the decree passed in favor of the respondent can be executed against the appellant under Order 21 Rule 35, CPC.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant is bound by the decree passed against the benamidar as all contentions that could be advanced by him were pressed by the benamidar and his heirs, who sufficiently represented the appellant; the decree is executable against him under Order 21 Rule 35, CPC and he must vacate the property.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment