RAJ KUMAR MOHAN SINGH & ORS. versus RAJ KUMAR PASUPATINATH SARAN SINGH & ORS.
Even in the non-taluqdari estate left by the taluqdar which devolved upon the widow, her adopted son had, so long as the widow was alive, no interest which he could transfer, alienate, or settle. Presumption of single heir succession applies to non-taluqdari property of a taluqdar entered in List 2 under Section 8 of the Oudh Estates Act, unless proved otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Raj Kumar Mohan Singh; Respondent: Raj Kumar Pasupatinam Saran Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Review of Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for review dismissed; original judgment upheld
- Legal Topics
- Oudh Estates Act, Devolution of Estates, Single Heir Succession, Adoption and Succession, Family Custom
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raj Kumar Mohan Singh
Appellant
Raj Kumar Pasupatinam Saran Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Review of Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-taluqdari estate follows same rule of succession as taluqdari estate under Oudh Estates Act
- 2 Whether adopted son could transfer, alienate or settle non-taluqdari property during lifetime of widow
- 3 Whether widow is an 'heir' under the Act for succession purposes
Ratio Decidendi
Even in the non-taluqdari estate left by the taluqdar which devolved upon the widow, her adopted son had, so long as the widow was alive, no interest which he could transfer, alienate, or settle. Presumption of single heir succession applies to non-taluqdari property of a taluqdar entered in List 2 under Section 8 of the Oudh Estates Act, unless proved otherwise.
Court Disposition
Petition for review dismissed; original judgment upheld
Orders
- It is declared that even in the non-taluqdari estate left by Raja Surpal Singh which devolved upon his widow Rani Jagannath Kuar for her life-time, Raja Bishwanath Singh had on August 29, 1932, no interest which he could transfer, alienate or settle.
- Senior Raj Kumar will pay the costs of this hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment