RAJAN WORLIKAR ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

RAJAN WORLIKAR ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

It cannot be said the appellants were not communicated about their right to make representation to the State Government; the grounds of detention specifically provided this right. The order of detention was made by the State Government, and delay in passing the order was sufficiently explained, rendering the order valid.

Parties
Appellant: Rajan Worlikar; Respondent: State of Karnataka; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Karnataka High Court
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances, Detention Order Communication, Delay in Detention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rajan Worlikar

Appellant

State of Karnataka

Respondent

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From Karnataka High Court

  1. 1 Whether the detenue was communicated the right to make representation to the State Government under the PITNDPS Act
  2. 2 Whether delay in passing the detention order renders it illegal or void

Ratio Decidendi

It cannot be said the appellants were not communicated about their right to make representation to the State Government; the grounds of detention specifically provided this right. The order of detention was made by the State Government, and delay in passing the order was sufficiently explained, rendering the order valid.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • No other contention raised
  • Detention order found valid