RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus LAVANSHU SANKHLA & ORS.
The relevant date for determining eligibility, including educational qualification, is the date of submission of the application; candidates must possess the requisite law degree by that date, and the press note of 29.11.2024 and deletion of the proviso to Rule 12 confirm that candidates appearing in the final year are not eligible.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer; Respondents: Lavanshu Sankhla & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Assistant Prosecution Officer Examination, Minimum Essential Qualification, Law Degree, Aliquid Prohibetur Ex Directo, Prohibetur Et Per Obliquum, Application Form, Advertisement, Time of Application, Re Submission of Documents, Rule 12 of Rajasthan Prosecution Subordinate Service Rules, 1978
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer
Appellant
Lavanshu Sankhla & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the relevant date for acquiring the minimum essential qualification is the date of submission of the application pursuant to the advertisement, or any time prior to the commencement of the interview process.
Ratio Decidendi
The relevant date for determining eligibility, including educational qualification, is the date of submission of the application; candidates must possess the requisite law degree by that date, and the press note of 29.11.2024 and deletion of the proviso to Rule 12 confirm that candidates appearing in the final year are not eligible.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Common judgment dated 12 August 2025 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court set aside
- Appeals allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment