RAJENDER SINGH & ORS. versus SANTA SINGH & ORS.
The doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act does not suspend or arrest the running of the statutory period of limitation for adverse possession during the pendency of a suit, and Banjar land is capable of adverse possession. The suit is therefore barred by limitation as per Article 142 of the Limitation Act, and the plaintiffs’ title cannot be revived or claimed based on lis pendens.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajender Singh; Respondent: Santa Singh; Respondent: Respondent No. 15
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal From Punjab High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation, Lis Pendens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajender Singh
Appellant
Santa Singh
Respondent
Respondent No. 15
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal From Punjab High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act arrests the running of limitation during pendency of suit
- 2 Whether Art. 142 of the Limitation Act bars the suit
- 3 Whether Banjar land is capable of adverse possession
Ratio Decidendi
The doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act does not suspend or arrest the running of the statutory period of limitation for adverse possession during the pendency of a suit, and Banjar land is capable of adverse possession. The suit is therefore barred by limitation as per Article 142 of the Limitation Act, and the plaintiffs’ title cannot be revived or claimed based on lis pendens.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment and decree of Punjab High Court affirmed
- Application seeking permission to introduce additional questions in respect of Banjar land dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment