RAJENDERA NATH KAR versus GANGADAS & GANGADHAR RATHI & ORS.
Section 39 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 expressly applies the Limitation Act to proceedings under it, subject to any special limitation period under the Act; therefore, an application to condone delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act is maintainable in relation to an application under section 17A of the Tenancy Act. In the facts, the appellant had sufficient cause for delay, as he was pursuing a bona fide revision; hence, the delay is condoned and the application under section 17A allowed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajendera Nath Kar; Respondents: Gangadas & Gangadhar Rathi & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment Dated 3 6 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Civil Rule No. 2924/68
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, Application of Limitation Act to Special Statutes, Condonation of Delay, Striking Off Defence, Eviction Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajendera Nath Kar
Appellant
Gangadas & Gangadhar Rathi & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment Dated 3 6 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Civil Rule No. 2924/68
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications under section 17A of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956
- 2 Whether delay in filing an application under section 17A can be condoned
Ratio Decidendi
Section 39 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 expressly applies the Limitation Act to proceedings under it, subject to any special limitation period under the Act; therefore, an application to condone delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act is maintainable in relation to an application under section 17A of the Tenancy Act. In the facts, the appellant had sufficient cause for delay, as he was pursuing a bona fide revision; hence, the delay is condoned and the application under section 17A allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Delay in filing application under section 17A condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
- Order dated July 25, 1963 striking off appellant's defence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment