RAJENDRA SINGH versus STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

RAJENDRA SINGH versus STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

The conviction under s.302 IPC is upheld as the medical evidence and testimonies of PW.2 and PW.3 are reliable and consistent with the prosecution case, and minor discrepancies or doubts about relationships do not undermine the main facts of the incident. The trial court's view was untenable and the High Court rightly reversed acquittal.

Parties
Appellant: Rajendra Singh; Respondent: State of Uttaranchal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Appreciation of Evidence, Maxim Falsus in Uno Falsus in Omnibus, Acquittal Reversal
Criminal Law Murder Appreciation of Evidence Maxim Falsus in Uno Falsus in Omnibus Acquittal Reversal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rajendra Singh

Appellant

State of Uttaranchal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction under s.302 IPC is sustainable based on eyewitness and medical evidence after trial court acquittal

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under s.302 IPC is upheld as the medical evidence and testimonies of PW.2 and PW.3 are reliable and consistent with the prosecution case, and minor discrepancies or doubts about relationships do not undermine the main facts of the incident. The trial court's view was untenable and the High Court rightly reversed acquittal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Bail bonds of the appellant cancelled
  • Appellant directed to surrender within four weeks