RAJESH KUMAR AND ANR. versus THE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS (INDIA)
The Institute cancelled the results and disqualified the appellants without appropriate consideration of material (answer books, sitting plan) and instead relied on a flawed 'cramming test.' Such decision was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and resulted from a process that did not comply with principles of fairness...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajesh Kumar; Appellant: Harbir Singh; Respondent: The Institute of Engineers (India)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court in Writ Petition No. 9699 of 1996
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Examinations, Unfair Means, Malpractice, Quashing of Result Cancellation, Jurisdiction of Examining Bodies
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajesh Kumar
Appellant
Harbir Singh
Appellant
The Institute of Engineers (India)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court in Writ Petition No. 9699 of 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Institute's cancellation of examination result and disqualification was arbitrary and in excess of jurisdiction
- 2 Whether due process and adequate opportunity were provided to the appellants
Ratio Decidendi
The Institute cancelled the results and disqualified the appellants without appropriate consideration of material (answer books, sitting plan) and instead relied on a flawed 'cramming test.' Such decision was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and resulted from a process that did not comply with principles of fairness and due process. The cancellation and disqualification orders were quashed and the Institute was directed to declare the results forthwith.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the High Court set aside
- Institute's communication/order dated 14.12.1990 (Annexure P-6) quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment