RAJPAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

RAJPAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Appellant, being similarly situated and left out, is entitled to regularisation and all consequential benefits except back wages.

Parties
Appellant: Rajpal; Respondents: State of Haryana and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 November 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Regularisation, Consequential Benefits, Back Wages
Service Law Regularisation Consequential Benefits Back Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rajpal

Appellant

State of Haryana and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to regularisation and consequential benefits when similarly situated persons have already been regularised.

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant, being similarly situated and left out, is entitled to regularisation and all consequential benefits except back wages.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Respondents directed to take appellant into service within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
  • Appellant not entitled to back wages; all other consequential benefits to be given.