RAJU DEVADE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

RAJU DEVADE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Conviction for murder rightly sustained on basis of dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate corroborated by oral statement and medical evidence; courts below correctly rejected theory of accidental death and found the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused poured kerosene and set victim on fire.

Parties
Appellant: Raju Devade; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision Affirming Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Murder, Dying Declaration, Evidentiary Value, Accidental Death, Conviction Under Section 302 IPC

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raju Devade

Appellant

State of Maharashtra

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision Affirming Conviction

  1. 1 Whether conviction for murder can be sustained on the basis of dying declarations
  2. 2 Duty of a court when more than one dying declaration exists
  3. 3 Reliability of dying declaration not in question-answer form

Ratio Decidendi

Conviction for murder rightly sustained on basis of dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate corroborated by oral statement and medical evidence; courts below correctly rejected theory of accidental death and found the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused poured kerosene and set victim on fire.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC against Raju Devade is affirmed.