DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS. versus RAJU, THROUGH MEMBER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD AND ANR.

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS. versus RAJU, THROUGH MEMBER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD AND ANR.

The present Special Leave Petition does not suffer from the vice of absence of locus standi of the petitioners. The petition seeks an authoritative pronouncement on interpretation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, with implications beyond the individual juvenile concerned. Thus, the petition is maintainable, and notice is issued.

Parties
Petitioners: Dr. Subramanian Swamy and Ors.; Respondent: Raju, through Member, Juvenile Justice Board; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Notice Issued; Question of Maintainability Decided
Outcome
Notice issued; Maintainability upheld; Petition to be heard on merits.
Legal Topics
Maintainability of Third Party Intervention, Interpretation of Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Locus Standi in Criminal Proceedings
Criminal Law Juvenile Justice Constitutional Law Maintainability of Third Party Intervention Interpretation of Juvenile Justice (care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 Locus Standi in Criminal Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Subramanian Swamy and Ors.

Petitioners

Raju, through Member, Juvenile Justice Board

Respondent

Union of India

Respondent

Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Notice Issued; Question of Maintainability Decided

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a third party/stranger has a right to be heard in criminal proceedings under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioners have the locus standi to seek an authoritative interpretation of the provisions of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The present Special Leave Petition does not suffer from the vice of absence of locus standi of the petitioners. The petition seeks an authoritative pronouncement on interpretation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, with implications beyond the individual juvenile concerned. Thus, the petition is maintainable, and notice is issued.

Court Disposition

Notice issued; Maintainability upheld; Petition to be heard on merits.

Orders

  • Notice issued in Special Leave Petition.
  • Juvenile Justice Board is at liberty to proceed in the matter against the first respondent and render such orders as may be considered just, adequate and proper.