APARNA GOYAL versus RAKESH GOYAL
The parties having arrived at a settlement for divorce by mutual consent and agreed to discontinue all pending proceedings, the Supreme Court directed disposal of cases and ordered the marriage dissolved by mutual consent under Section 138 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Aparna Goyal; Respondent: Rakesh Goyal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Transfer Petition (civil) / Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petitions disposed of; marriage dissolved by mutual consent; orders passed as per settlement.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce by Mutual Consent, Settlement, Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aparna Goyal
Petitioner
Rakesh Goyal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition (civil) / Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parties are entitled to divorce by mutual consent as per settlement
- 2 Disposition of pending criminal and civil proceedings based on settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The parties having arrived at a settlement for divorce by mutual consent and agreed to discontinue all pending proceedings, the Supreme Court directed disposal of cases and ordered the marriage dissolved by mutual consent under Section 138 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956.
Court Disposition
Petitions disposed of; marriage dissolved by mutual consent; orders passed as per settlement.
Orders
- Sum of Rs. 10 lakh deposited with the Registry of the Supreme Court to be handed over to Aparna Goyal, the wife.
- Proceedings in Case No.259/2003 (Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi), Case No.1011/1/2003 (under Section 125 CrPC), and HMA No.37/2006 (Divorce by husband, District Judge Muktsar, Punjab) are disposed of.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment