RAM ADHAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. versus BANSI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
A usufructuary mortgage executed by an occupancy tenant is not a valid transfer and confers only a qualified right of possession to the mortgagee until repayment of debt; the matter is settled by statute and precedent, and occupancy rights are non-transferable under relevant laws.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ram Adhar Singh (Dead) through LRs. & Ors.; Respondent: Bansi (Dead) through LRs. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Usufructuary Mortgage, Occupancy Tenant, Non Transferability of Occupancy Rights, Debt Redemption, Zamindari Abolition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Adhar Singh (Dead) through LRs. & Ors.
Appellant
Bansi (Dead) through LRs. & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of usufructuary mortgage by occupancy tenant under statutory law
- 2 Transferability of occupancy rights in land
- 3 Effect of tenancy laws and zamindari abolition statutes on mortgagee rights
Ratio Decidendi
A usufructuary mortgage executed by an occupancy tenant is not a valid transfer and confers only a qualified right of possession to the mortgagee until repayment of debt; the matter is settled by statute and precedent, and occupancy rights are non-transferable under relevant laws.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal must fail and is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment