RAM CHARAN & ORS. versus SUKHRAM & ORS.
In the absence of any proved custom or law denying succession to female members of the Scheduled Tribe, the courts must apply the principles of justice, equity and good conscience (s.6, Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875) and Article 14; consequently the legal heirs of the deceased tribal woman (Dhaiya) are entitled to an equal share in the ancestral property, and accrued rights are not defeated by the subsequent repeal of the 1875 Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ram Charan & Ors.; Respondent: Sukhram & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court (civil Appeal No. 9537 of 2025)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance of Tribal Woman to Ancestral Property, Application of Custom in Succession, Principles of Justice, Equity and Good Conscience (s.6 Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875), Article 14 Equality and Gender Discrimination, Effect of Repeal on Accrued Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Charan & Ors.
Appellant
Sukhram & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court (civil Appeal No. 9537 of 2025)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a tribal woman or her legal heirs are entitled to an equal share in her ancestral property
- 2 Whether absence of proved custom excluding female succession requires application of justice, equity and good conscience
- 3 Whether repeal of the Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875 affects rights accrued before repeal
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of any proved custom or law denying succession to female members of the Scheduled Tribe, the courts must apply the principles of justice, equity and good conscience (s.6, Central Provinces Laws Act, 1875) and Article 14; consequently the legal heirs of the deceased tribal woman (Dhaiya) are entitled to an equal share in the ancestral property, and accrued rights are not defeated by the subsequent repeal of the 1875 Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of the High Court and the courts below set aside to the extent of denying share to the appellant-plaintiffs
- Appellant-plaintiffs (legal heirs of Dhaiya) declared entitled to their equal share in the property
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment