RAM DHARI JINDAL MEMORIAL TRUST versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

RAM DHARI JINDAL MEMORIAL TRUST versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Invocation of urgency power and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A for planned development of city or residential scheme, absent real urgency and need for immediate possession, cannot be legally sustained; government failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying elimination of Section 5A enquiry.

Parties
Appellant: Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust; Respondents: Union of India and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 09.07.2007
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Urgency Clause, Elimination of Section 5 a Enquiry, Planned Development, Procedural Rights in Acquisition, Burden of Proof
Land Acquisition Urgency Clause Elimination of Section 5 a Enquiry Planned Development Procedural Rights in Acquisition Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust

Appellant

Union of India and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 09.07.2007

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Permissibility and justification for invoking urgency clause under Section 17(1) and (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  2. 2 Whether dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A is legally sustainable for planned development of city or residential scheme

Ratio Decidendi

Invocation of urgency power and dispensation of enquiry under Section 5A for planned development of city or residential scheme, absent real urgency and need for immediate possession, cannot be legally sustained; government failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying elimination of Section 5A enquiry.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Section 4 Notification dated October 27, 1999 (regarding appellant's land) quashed.
  • Section 6 declaration dated April 3, 2000 quashed.