RAM KALI BHATTACHARJEE versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Due to paucity of evidence regarding the date of award and service of notice, as well as the timing of reference applications, it is not desirable to decide the controversy without factual foundation. The Reference Court must decide these questions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ram Kali Bhattacharjee; Respondent: State of West Bengal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment of the High Court and Reference Court set aside; matter remitted to Reference Court for fresh determination
- Legal Topics
- Limitation on Reference Applications, Compensation for Acquired Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Kali Bhattacharjee
Appellant
State of West Bengal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Reference Applications made by the appellant were within the limitation as provided under the proviso to section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Ratio Decidendi
Due to paucity of evidence regarding the date of award and service of notice, as well as the timing of reference applications, it is not desirable to decide the controversy without factual foundation. The Reference Court must decide these questions.
Court Disposition
Judgment of the High Court and Reference Court set aside; matter remitted to Reference Court for fresh determination
Orders
- Matter referred to Reference Court to decide limitation and compensation according to law
- Reference Court directed to dispose of the matter within 6 months from receipt of order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment