RAM KARAN & ORS. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Majority held that the occurrence was the result of a sudden fight in the heat of passion without premeditation and without undue advantage taken by either side. Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC applied, reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder for Sunil Kumar and Ved Prakash,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ram Karan; Appellant: Sunil Kumar; Appellant: Ved Prakash; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Culpable Homicide, Murder, Benefit of Doubt
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Karan
Appellant
Sunil Kumar
Appellant
Ved Prakash
Appellant
State of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper classification and sentencing for homicide arising out of a sudden quarrel
- 2 Applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
- 3 Determination of aggressors and right of private defense
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held that the occurrence was the result of a sudden fight in the heat of passion without premeditation and without undue advantage taken by either side. Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC applied, reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder for Sunil Kumar and Ved Prakash, sentenced under Section 304(1)/34 IPC. Ram Karan was acquitted due to reasonable doubt regarding his participation.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Conviction of Ram Karan under Sections 302/34 (two counts) and 307/34 IPC set aside; Ram Karan acquitted and to be set at liberty if not required in another case.
- Convictions of Sunil Kumar and Ved Prakash altered from Section 302/34 IPC to Section 304(1)/34 IPC; sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment