RAM NIBAS GAGAR (DEAD) BY LRS. versus DEBOJYOTI DAS AND ORS.

RAM NIBAS GAGAR (DEAD) BY LRS. versus DEBOJYOTI DAS AND ORS.

Applications to bring on record subsequent events failed as tenant did not show material bearing on the relief sought or that events were promptly brought to notice of the courts; therefore, no ground to interfere with the eviction decree.

Parties
Appellant: Ram Nibas Gagar (Dead) By LRS.; Respondents: Debojyoti Das and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment in Revision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Eviction, Subsequent Events in Litigation, Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972
Rent Control Landlord and Tenant Law Eviction Subsequent Events in Litigation Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ram Nibas Gagar (Dead) By LRS.

Appellant

Debojyoti Das and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment in Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether subsequent events during pendency can be brought on record to defeat eviction decree in rent control proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

Applications to bring on record subsequent events failed as tenant did not show material bearing on the relief sought or that events were promptly brought to notice of the courts; therefore, no ground to interfere with the eviction decree.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Tenant-appellant allowed six months' time to vacate the suit premises subject to filing usual undertaking within six weeks from date of decision.