RAM PRAKASH AGARWAL & ANR. versus GOPI KRISHAN (DEAD THROUGH L.RS.) & ORS.
Order IX Rule 13 CPC is not maintainable by a non-party; Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked where fraud has been committed upon a party (not the Court)--remedy lies in an independent suit. Reference Court's jurisdiction is limited to references by Land Acquisition Officer under Sections 18 or 30; direct applications for impleadment or apportionment before Reference Court are not permissible.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ram Prakash Agarwal; Appellant: Ram Prakash Agarwal & Anr.; Respondent: Gopi Krishan (Dead Through L.Rs.) & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court judgment and order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Orders, Fraud on Party or Court, Inherent Powers of Court, Reference Proceedings, Impleadment, Apportionment of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ram Prakash Agarwal
Appellant
Ram Prakash Agarwal & Anr.
Appellant
Gopi Krishan (Dead Through L.Rs.) & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Is an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC maintainable by a person who was not a party to the suit?
- 2 Can such relief be granted under Section 151 CPC?
- 3 Are CPC provisions applicable to Land Acquisition proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
Order IX Rule 13 CPC is not maintainable by a non-party; Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked where fraud has been committed upon a party (not the Court)--remedy lies in an independent suit. Reference Court's jurisdiction is limited to references by Land Acquisition Officer under Sections 18 or 30; direct applications for impleadment or apportionment before Reference Court are not permissible.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court judgment and order set aside.
Orders
- The impugned judgment and order of the High Court are set aside.
- Respondents are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy by resorting to appropriate proceedings as permissible in law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment