RAM SWAROOP RAI versus LILAVATHI

RAM SWAROOP RAI versus LILAVATHI

The onus of proving exemption from the U.P. Rent Control Act on the ground of new construction within ten years of suit lies on the landlord, not the tenant; reliance should be placed on municipal records to determine date and nature of construction, and speculative findings by lower courts without such evidence cannot sustain an eviction order.

Parties
Appellant: Ram Swaroop Rai; Respondent: Lilavathi
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 May 1980
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of Allahabad High Court in Civil Revision No. 900 of 1978
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Eviction order set aside; matter remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal.
Legal Topics
Exemption of New Constructions Under Rent Acts, Burden of Proof in Eviction Matters

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ram Swaroop Rai

Appellant

Lilavathi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of Allahabad High Court in Civil Revision No. 900 of 1978

  1. 1 Whether the burden of proof for exemption from the Rent Control Act for a new construction lies on the landlord or tenant
  2. 2 What is the relevant date and manner for determining completion of construction under the U.P. Rent Control Act, Section 2(2)

Ratio Decidendi

The onus of proving exemption from the U.P. Rent Control Act on the ground of new construction within ten years of suit lies on the landlord, not the tenant; reliance should be placed on municipal records to determine date and nature of construction, and speculative findings by lower courts without such evidence cannot sustain an eviction order.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Eviction order set aside; matter remanded to the trial court for fresh disposal.

Orders

  • The judgment of the courts below is set aside.
  • Case remitted to the trial court (First Additional District Judge, Jhansi) for fresh disposal in light of the Supreme Court's observations.