RAMA PASWAN AND ORS. versus STATE OF JHARKHAND

RAMA PASWAN AND ORS. versus STATE OF JHARKHAND

Prayer for recalling the victim was rightly rejected as Section 376 IPC is not compoundable; Section 311 Cr.P.C. gives discretionary power to summon witnesses, and courts must exercise this power judiciously based on whether the evidence is essential to a just decision.

Parties
Appellant: Rama Paswan and Ors.; Respondent: State of Jharkhand
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
13 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Dismissing Section 482 Cr.p.c. Application
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Examination of Witnesses, Section 311 Cr.p.c., Compoundability of Offences, Recall and Re Examination of Witnesses
Criminal Law Rape Examination of Witnesses Section 311 Cr.p.c. Compoundability of Offences Recall and Re Examination of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rama Paswan and Ors.

Appellant

State of Jharkhand

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Dismissing Section 482 Cr.p.c. Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the victim can be recalled for further cross-examination at the stage of argument where parties claimed to have settled the dispute outside court
  2. 2 Scope and application of Section 311 Cr.P.C.
  3. 3 Compoundability of the offence under Section 376 IPC

Ratio Decidendi

Prayer for recalling the victim was rightly rejected as Section 376 IPC is not compoundable; Section 311 Cr.P.C. gives discretionary power to summon witnesses, and courts must exercise this power judiciously based on whether the evidence is essential to a just decision.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal is dismissed.