RAMACHANDRAN & ORS. versus VIJAYAN & ORS.
Where property on partition is allotted to a thavazhi (a multi-member branch consisting of a female and her children/descendants), the property retains tharwad character and enures to members of that thavazhi; however, as a general rule a single female who at the time of partition has no descendants holds the allotted share as her separate property (minority view in Mary Cheriyan upheld on point of law), and the Supreme Court will apply that rule prospectively; concurrent factual findings that the disputed properties were received by a thavazhi and thus are tharwad property are not disturbed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramachandran & Ors.; Respondent: Vijayan & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment Dated 27.08.2009 of the High Court of Kerala in as No.563 of 1999; Judgment of Supreme Court Dated 22 November 2024
- Legal Topics
- Tharwad, Thavazhi, Partition, Marumakkathayee Female Rights, Mortgage Deed, Concurrent Findings of Fact, Prospective Application of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramachandran & Ors.
Appellant
Vijayan & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment Dated 27.08.2009 of the High Court of Kerala in as No.563 of 1999; Judgment of Supreme Court Dated 22 November 2024
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property obtained by a female and her children after partition would be considered their separate property or would it belong to her tharwad?
- 2 Whether, in the present facts, Parvathy Amma had the legal right to transfer the entire property of her son to her daughter-in-law and grandchildren by way of a mortgage deed or was her right only limited to one-sixth of the property?
Ratio Decidendi
Where property on partition is allotted to a thavazhi (a multi-member branch consisting of a female and her children/descendants), the property retains tharwad character and enures to members of that thavazhi; however, as a general rule a single female who at the time of partition has no descendants holds the allotted share as her separate property (minority view in Mary Cheriyan upheld on point of law), and the Supreme Court will apply that rule prospectively; concurrent factual findings that the disputed properties were received by a thavazhi and thus are tharwad property are not disturbed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment