RAMADHAR SHRIVAS versus BHAGWANDAS
The doctrine of res judicata and constructive res judicata applies; the appellant's ownership and the landlord-tenant relationship were conclusively established in earlier proceedings and cannot be re-contested. The respondent is barred from denying appellant's title or raising claims that ought to have been raised in earlier suits.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramadhar Shrivas; Respondent: Bhagwandas
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Constructive Res Judicata, Landlord Tenant, Title to Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramadhar Shrivas
Appellant
Bhagwandas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's ownership over the property was conclusively established in earlier proceedings and operates as res judicata against the respondent
- 2 Whether the doctrine of constructive res judicata applies to prevent the respondent from raising defences not raised in earlier suits
- 3 Whether there exists a landlord-tenant relationship between the parties as found in previous litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The doctrine of res judicata and constructive res judicata applies; the appellant's ownership and the landlord-tenant relationship were conclusively established in earlier proceedings and cannot be re-contested. The respondent is barred from denying appellant's title or raising claims that ought to have been raised in earlier suits.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Lower Appellate Court decree and High Court order set aside
- Trial Court's decree for possession restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment