RAMAKRISHNA RAO (DEAD) BY LR. versus RAI MURARI
The High Court's direction for appellant to refund money to respondent was incorrect, as it proceeded on untenable premises and findings contrary to materials and findings on record, with no established agreement for sale. Therefore, the refund direction was set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramakrishna Rao (Dead) by LR.; Respondent: Rai Murari
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court direction for refund set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Permanent Injunction, Refund of Money, Agreement for Sale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramakrishna Rao (Dead) by LR.
Appellant
Rai Murari
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the direction by the High Court to refund money paid by the respondent's wife allegedly in terms of an agreement was valid
- 2 Whether there was an established agreement for sale between plaintiff and defendant's wife for the suit property
- 3 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to an injunction restraining interference with possession
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court's direction for appellant to refund money to respondent was incorrect, as it proceeded on untenable premises and findings contrary to materials and findings on record, with no established agreement for sale. Therefore, the refund direction was set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court direction for refund set aside.
Orders
- Direction for refund of money to respondent is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment