RAMESH KUMAR V. BHATINDA INTEGRATED COOPERATIVE COTTON SPINNING MILL AND ORS. versus BHATINDA INTEGRATED COOPERATIVE COTTON SPINNING MILL AND ORS.
The High Court's valuation of Rs.88,400 per acre is upheld: reliance on the 24.05.1979 sale deed (more than nine years before notification) did not justify a flat 12% annual escalation; given the facts (including militancy affecting prices) escalation should not exceed 10% maximum and the High Court's adoption of a...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramesh Kumar; Respondent: Bhatinda Integrated Cooperative Cotton Spinning Mill and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enhancement of Compensation, Market Value Determination, Escalation of Past Transactions, Deduction for Development Charges
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramesh Kumar
Appellant
Bhatinda Integrated Cooperative Cotton Spinning Mill and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the courts below erred in taking annual increase at the rate of 12% at the flat rate and not applying the cumulative rate
- 2 Whether the High Court erred in adopting the cut/deduction of 15% while determining the value of the land acquired
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court's valuation of Rs.88,400 per acre is upheld: reliance on the 24.05.1979 sale deed (more than nine years before notification) did not justify a flat 12% annual escalation; given the facts (including militancy affecting prices) escalation should not exceed 10% maximum and the High Court's adoption of a 15% cut for development charges was appropriate; appeals dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- High Court judgment determining value at Rs.88,400 per acre upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment