RAMESH SINGH AND ANR. versus CINTA DEVI AND ORS.
The right to appeal under the Old Act crystalises at the time of institution of the claim, and such vested right is not affected by the repeal; the appellant may file appeal without deposit under Section 173 of the New Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ramesh Singh and Anr.; Respondent: Cinta Devi and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 11.10.93 of the Patna High Court in M.a. No. 252 of 1992
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right of Appeal, Retrospective Application, Repeal of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramesh Singh and Anr.
Appellant
Cinta Devi and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 11.10.93 of the Patna High Court in M.a. No. 252 of 1992
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right of appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 survives after its repeal by the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
- 2 Whether the claimant is required to make a deposit under proviso to Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for appeals instituted under the Old Act
Ratio Decidendi
The right to appeal under the Old Act crystalises at the time of institution of the claim, and such vested right is not affected by the repeal; the appellant may file appeal without deposit under Section 173 of the New Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The impugned judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal is set aside
- The matter is remanded to the High Court for disposal of the appeal in accordance with law without insisting on deposit of the amount
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment