RANG NATH versus DAULATRAO AND ORS.

RANG NATH versus DAULATRAO AND ORS.

Mere service of termination notice and application under the Tenancy Act does not end tenancy; tenant remains in possession as tenant unless and until possession is delivered upon competent authority's order. Respondent No. 1 acquired occupancy rights on vesting of Inam under section 6(1) of the Abolition of Inams Act. The issue was already determined in earlier High Court proceedings and cannot be revisited; res judicata applies.

Parties
Appellant: Rangnath; Respondent No. 1: Daulatrao; Respondent No. 2: Respondent No. 2
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 December 1974
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abolition of Inams, Tenancy Termination, Res Judicata, Natural Justice, Statutory Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rangnath

Appellant

Daulatrao

Respondent No. 1

Respondent No. 2

Respondent No. 2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether State Government must give personal hearing and pass speaking order when disposing statutory appeal under the Abolition of Inams Act
  2. 2 Whether service of notice and application under the Tenancy Act terminates tenancy before possession is delivered
  3. 3 Whether tenant acquires occupant rights under section 6(1) of Abolition of Inams Act

Ratio Decidendi

Mere service of termination notice and application under the Tenancy Act does not end tenancy; tenant remains in possession as tenant unless and until possession is delivered upon competent authority's order. Respondent No. 1 acquired occupancy rights on vesting of Inam under section 6(1) of the Abolition of Inams Act. The issue was already determined in earlier High Court proceedings and cannot be revisited; res judicata applies.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs to respondent No. 1