RANI RATNESH KUMARI versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
The appellant was the proprietor and thus intermediary in the 133 biswadari villages; malikana was not a pension but a share in profits of land, directly connected with proprietary rights which vested in the State upon notification under the Act; malikana ceased save for statutory compensation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rani Ratnesh Kumari; Respondents: State of U.P. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Decision of Division Bench of Allahabad High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Zamindari Abolition, Malikana Allowance, Intermediary Under Land Reform Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rani Ratnesh Kumari
Appellant
State of U.P. & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Decision of Division Bench of Allahabad High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was an 'intermediary' of the 133 biswadari villages under section 3(12) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950
- 2 Whether 'malikana' allowance is in the nature of pension or is a right in land/revenue extinguished by the vesting of the estate in the State
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was the proprietor and thus intermediary in the 133 biswadari villages; malikana was not a pension but a share in profits of land, directly connected with proprietary rights which vested in the State upon notification under the Act; malikana ceased save for statutory compensation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No malikana payable; appellant limited to compensation as per statute
- Costs to the respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment