RATAN LAL SHAH versus FIRM LALMANDAS CHHADAMMALAL & ANR.
The High Court erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of non-service to the co-defendant and the possibility of conflicting decrees; one defendant may appeal and obtain relief on a ground common with the other under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ratan Lal Shah; Respondent No. 1: Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal; Respondent No. 2: Mohan Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / On Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree Dated July 10, 1963 of the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal No. 16 of 1953.
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court's decree set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Order 41 Rule 4 CPC, Joint Decree, Appeal by One of Multiple Parties, Appellate Jurisdiction, Non Service of Co Defendant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ratan Lal Shah
Appellant
Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal
Respondent No. 1
Mohan Singh
Respondent No. 2
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree Dated July 10, 1963 of the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal No. 16 of 1953.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal by only one defendant against a joint decree is maintainable even if the co-defendant is not served.
- 2 Whether the High Court could dismiss the appeal due to non-service of notice to the co-defendant or possibility of conflicting decrees.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of non-service to the co-defendant and the possibility of conflicting decrees; one defendant may appeal and obtain relief on a ground common with the other under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court's decree set aside.
Orders
- High Court to admit the appeal in its original number and hear and dispose it according to law.
- No order as to costs in the Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment