RATAN LAL SHAH versus FIRM LALMANDAS CHHADAMMALAL & ANR.

RATAN LAL SHAH versus FIRM LALMANDAS CHHADAMMALAL & ANR.

The High Court erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of non-service to the co-defendant and the possibility of conflicting decrees; one defendant may appeal and obtain relief on a ground common with the other under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC.

Parties
Appellant: Ratan Lal Shah; Respondent No. 1: Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal; Respondent No. 2: Mohan Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
15 April 1969
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree Dated July 10, 1963 of the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal No. 16 of 1953.
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court's decree set aside.
Legal Topics
Order 41 Rule 4 CPC, Joint Decree, Appeal by One of Multiple Parties, Appellate Jurisdiction, Non Service of Co Defendant

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ratan Lal Shah

Appellant

Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal

Respondent No. 1

Mohan Singh

Respondent No. 2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / On Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree Dated July 10, 1963 of the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal No. 16 of 1953.

  1. 1 Whether an appeal by only one defendant against a joint decree is maintainable even if the co-defendant is not served.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court could dismiss the appeal due to non-service of notice to the co-defendant or possibility of conflicting decrees.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court erred in dismissing the appeal on the grounds of non-service to the co-defendant and the possibility of conflicting decrees; one defendant may appeal and obtain relief on a ground common with the other under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court's decree set aside.

Orders

  • High Court to admit the appeal in its original number and hear and dispose it according to law.
  • No order as to costs in the Supreme Court.