ARVEE INDUSTRIES & ORS. versus RATAN LAL SHARMA
It is expedient for the ends of justice to transfer suit No. 690 of 1975 from the Calcutta High Court to Delhi High Court given the parties' residence, cause of action in Delhi, convenience for trial, and hardship to petitioners in Calcutta; Supreme Court has jurisdiction under section 25 CPC.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Arvee Industries & Ors.; Respondent: Ratan Lal Sharma
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Transfer Petition / Original Jurisdiction, Decision on Application Under Section 25 of CPC
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; suit transferred.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suits, Jurisdiction, Section 25 CPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arvee Industries & Ors.
Petitioner
Ratan Lal Sharma
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition / Original Jurisdiction, Decision on Application Under Section 25 of CPC
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to transfer a suit pending on the original side of the Calcutta High Court to the Delhi High Court under section 25 CPC
- 2 Whether convenience and ends of justice warrant the transfer of suit
- 3 Effect of alleged lack of territorial jurisdiction and procedural hardship
Ratio Decidendi
It is expedient for the ends of justice to transfer suit No. 690 of 1975 from the Calcutta High Court to Delhi High Court given the parties' residence, cause of action in Delhi, convenience for trial, and hardship to petitioners in Calcutta; Supreme Court has jurisdiction under section 25 CPC.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; suit transferred.
Orders
- Suit No. 690 of 1975 on original side of Calcutta High Court transferred to original side of Delhi High Court for disposal according to law.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment