RAVI NORA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA versus STATE OF M.P. & ORS.

RAVI NORA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA versus STATE OF M.P. & ORS.

The appellant did not meet the eligibility criteria of having continuously worked for five years as Steno-typist before promotion; his promotion was rightly cancelled and he became eligible only in 2007 after five years from absorption as Steno-typist.

Parties
Appellant: Ravi Nora Kumar Shrivastava; Respondents: State of M.P. & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Promotion, Eligibility Criteria, Seniority
Service Law Promotion Eligibility Criteria Seniority

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ravi Nora Kumar Shrivastava

Appellant

State of M.P. & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant fulfilled eligibility criteria for promotion to Stenographer
  2. 2 Whether departmental promotion could be cancelled based on eligibility requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant did not meet the eligibility criteria of having continuously worked for five years as Steno-typist before promotion; his promotion was rightly cancelled and he became eligible only in 2007 after five years from absorption as Steno-typist.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs