RAVI PRAKASH SINGH @ARVIND SINGH versus STATE OF BIHAR
Since the day of remand (5.7.2013) is to be excluded and the day the charge sheet was filed (3.10.2013) is to be included, the charge sheet was filed within ninety days. There was no infringement of Section 167(2) CrPC, and the appellant was not entitled to bail under that provision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ravi Prakash Singh @ Arvind Singh; Respondent: State of Bihar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Bail Under S.167(2) Cr PC
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr PC, Computation of Remand Period, Filing Date of Charge Sheet
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ravi Prakash Singh @ Arvind Singh
Appellant
State of Bihar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Bail Under S.167(2) Cr PC
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal of bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was justified when the charge sheet was allegedly not filed within 90 days after accused's surrender?
- 2 How should the period of ninety days be computed under Section 167(2) CrPC for filing of charge sheet?
Ratio Decidendi
Since the day of remand (5.7.2013) is to be excluded and the day the charge sheet was filed (3.10.2013) is to be included, the charge sheet was filed within ninety days. There was no infringement of Section 167(2) CrPC, and the appellant was not entitled to bail under that provision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Lower court record to be sent back forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment