RAVINDER KAUR versus ANIL KUMAR
The bar on subsequent prosecution under Section 300 CrPC does not apply since the earlier proceedings resulted only in a discharge, not an acquittal following trial. Section 493 IPC is inapplicable as matrimonial ties existed due to setting aside of the ex-parte divorce; no deceit as to the existence of the marriage could occur. The offence under Section 494 IPC is compounded with the appellant's consent and the respondent is directed to pay compensation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ravinder Kaur; Respondent: Anil Kumar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition of Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of on terms indicated
- Legal Topics
- Bigamy, Deceitful Cohabitation, Compounding of Offences, Bar to Second Prosecution, Matrimonial Ties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ravinder Kaur
Appellant
Anil Kumar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition of Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a second complaint is barred by Section 300 CrPC after discharge under Section 376 IPC on the same facts
- 2 Whether the ingredients of Section 493 IPC are made out where matrimonial ties subsisted
- 3 Whether Section 494 IPC offence may be compounded under Section 320 CrPC
Ratio Decidendi
The bar on subsequent prosecution under Section 300 CrPC does not apply since the earlier proceedings resulted only in a discharge, not an acquittal following trial. Section 493 IPC is inapplicable as matrimonial ties existed due to setting aside of the ex-parte divorce; no deceit as to the existence of the marriage could occur. The offence under Section 494 IPC is compounded with the appellant's consent and the respondent is directed to pay compensation.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of on terms indicated
Orders
- Complaint under Section 494 IPC is compounded under Section 320 CrPC with consent of appellant.
- Respondent shall pay Rs. 5 lakhs as compensation to the appellant within two months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment