RAVINDRA versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Conviction under Section 376 IPC is upheld based on prosecutrix's testimony and supporting evidence, but in view of absence of injuries, passage of 20 years, and parties having entered into compromise and settled in life, sentence is reduced to period already undergone in terms of proviso to Section 376(2) IPC.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ravindra; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 12.03.2013 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore
- Outcome
- Conviction upheld, sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing Under IPC Section 376, Corroboration of Evidence, Appreciation of Medical Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ravindra
Appellant
State of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 12.03.2013 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction under Section 376 IPC is sustainable in light of medical evidence and contradictions in prosecution case
- 2 Whether sentence should be reduced under the proviso to Section 376(2) IPC due to passage of time and compromise
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under Section 376 IPC is upheld based on prosecutrix's testimony and supporting evidence, but in view of absence of injuries, passage of 20 years, and parties having entered into compromise and settled in life, sentence is reduced to period already undergone in terms of proviso to Section 376(2) IPC.
Court Disposition
Conviction upheld, sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence reduced to period already undergone by appellant
- Appeal disposed of accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment