RAYMOND LTD. & ANOTHER versus TUKARAM TANAJI MANDHARE & ANOTHER
Due to conflicting judicial opinions and the importance of the issues regarding the status of contract labour under State statutes, the Supreme Court found it necessary to refer the matter to a larger bench for an authoritative resolution.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Raymond Ltd.; Respondent: Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare; Appellant: Another; Respondent: Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Reference to Larger Bench
- Outcome
- Matter referred to larger bench.
- Legal Topics
- Employee Employer Relationship, Maintainability of Complaints, Contract Labour, Unfair Labour Practices
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raymond Ltd.
Appellant
Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare
Respondent
Another
Appellant
Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Reference to Larger Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person employed by a contractor executing the whole or any part of ordinarily the work of the undertaking is an employee within section 3(5) of the MRTU and PULP Act.
- 2 Whether a complaint under the MRTU and PULP Act by an employee as defined under section 3(13) of the BIR Act is maintainable without a direct employer-employee relationship with the principal employer.
- 3 Whether a complaint under the MRTU and PULP Act by employees under section 3(13) of the BIR Act can be dismissed if the employer claims they are not his direct employees but are employed through a contractor.
Ratio Decidendi
Due to conflicting judicial opinions and the importance of the issues regarding the status of contract labour under State statutes, the Supreme Court found it necessary to refer the matter to a larger bench for an authoritative resolution.
Court Disposition
Matter referred to larger bench.
Orders
- Let the papers of this case be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment