MITRANGSHU ROY CHOUDHARY AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MITRANGSHU ROY CHOUDHARY AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Trade Apprentices who completed training are not entitled to appointment as a matter of right under the Apprentices Act or recruitment rules. Railway's policy to fill Group C posts by promotion from Group D to accommodate surplus staff and maintain industrial peace is not arbitrary or discriminatory. Temporary appointment letters could be cancelled with notice or pay in lieu, and this does not violate Articles 14 and 16.

Parties
Appellants: Mitrangshu Roy Choudhary and Ors.; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
15 April 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Recruitment Policies, Trade Apprentices, Temporary Appointment, Promotion Policy, Industrial Peace, Arbitrariness, Discrimination
Service Law Constitutional Law Recruitment Policies Trade Apprentices Temporary Appointment Promotion Policy Industrial Peace Arbitrariness +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mitrangshu Roy Choudhary and Ors.

Appellants

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Trade Apprentices have a right to appointment under the Apprentices Act, 1961 or the relevant recruitment rules
  2. 2 Whether cancellation of appointment and absorption in Group D posts violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution

Ratio Decidendi

Trade Apprentices who completed training are not entitled to appointment as a matter of right under the Apprentices Act or recruitment rules. Railway's policy to fill Group C posts by promotion from Group D to accommodate surplus staff and maintain industrial peace is not arbitrary or discriminatory. Temporary appointment letters could be cancelled with notice or pay in lieu, and this does not violate Articles 14 and 16.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Parties to bear their own costs