GOA ANTIBIOTICS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. versus R.K. CHAWLA & ANOTHER

GOA ANTIBIOTICS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. versus R.K. CHAWLA & ANOTHER

The Supreme Court held that only enrolled advocates have the right to appear and argue in courts, except when the court exercises its discretion under Section 32 of Advocates Act. The application by the power of attorney holder to argue on behalf of the company was rejected; companies are distinct legal entities and must be represented by advocates unless the court permits otherwise.

Parties
Petitioner: Goa Antibiotics & Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Respondent: R.K. Chawla; Respondent: Another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition / Order on Permission to Argue by Power of Attorney Holder
Outcome
Application by power of attorney holder rejected; four weeks granted to engage lawyer.
Legal Topics
Right to Practice Before Courts, Power of Attorney, Appearance by Corporate Representatives
Advocates Act Company Law Right to Practice Before Courts Power of Attorney Appearance by Corporate Representatives

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Goa Antibiotics & Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Petitioner

R.K. Chawla

Respondent

Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition / Order on Permission to Argue by Power of Attorney Holder

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a power of attorney holder who is not an enrolled advocate may argue in court on behalf of a company
  2. 2 Rights of artificial persons to be represented in court
  3. 3 Court's discretion under Section 32 of Advocates Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that only enrolled advocates have the right to appear and argue in courts, except when the court exercises its discretion under Section 32 of Advocates Act. The application by the power of attorney holder to argue on behalf of the company was rejected; companies are distinct legal entities and must be represented by advocates unless the court permits otherwise.

Court Disposition

Application by power of attorney holder rejected; four weeks granted to engage lawyer.

Orders

  • Petitioner company granted four weeks to engage a lawyer to appear and argue on its behalf.
  • Matter adjourned.