RAN SINGH MALIK versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

RAN SINGH MALIK versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

The post of Deputy Director (Feed and Fodder) is an ex-cadre post with a lower pay scale than regular cadre posts. Appellant is not entitled to the pay scale of regular Class I cadre posts or seniority over respondents who hold cadre posts. The bifurcation of veterinary and non-veterinary services under the 1995 Rules makes inter-se seniority between such posts inapplicable.

Parties
Appellant: R.S. Malik; Respondents: State of Haryana and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
13 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petitions and Letters Patent Appeal by Punjab and Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Inter Se Seniority, Cadre Post, Ex Cadre Post, Pay Scale, Recruitment Rules
Service Law Inter Se Seniority Cadre Post Ex Cadre Post Pay Scale Recruitment Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R.S. Malik

Appellant

State of Haryana and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petitions and Letters Patent Appeal by Punjab and Haryana High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the post of Deputy Director (Feed and Fodder) is an ex-cadre post with lower pay scale under the Haryana Veterinary Service Class I Rules, 1930 and Haryana Veterinary (Group A) Service Rules, 1995
  2. 2 Whether appellant is entitled to enhanced pay scale and seniority over respondents

Ratio Decidendi

The post of Deputy Director (Feed and Fodder) is an ex-cadre post with a lower pay scale than regular cadre posts. Appellant is not entitled to the pay scale of regular Class I cadre posts or seniority over respondents who hold cadre posts. The bifurcation of veterinary and non-veterinary services under the 1995 Rules makes inter-se seniority between such posts inapplicable.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed; impugned judgment of High Court affirmed