S. GOVINDA MENON versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

S. GOVINDA MENON versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Disciplinary proceedings may be validly initiated against a government servant acting as Commissioner, even if as a corporation sole, for acts or omissions which reflect upon integrity or duty. Suspension under Rule 7(1) may precede formal framing of charges. Commissioner has no authority to sanction leases without auction, nor to initiate lease proposals, and disciplinary action is not precluded by appellate remedies under the relevant statute.

Parties
Appellant: S. Govinda Menon; Respondent 1: The Union of India; Respondent 2: State of Kerala
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 February 1967
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Kerala High Court's Dismissal of Original Petition No. 1 of 1964
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Proceedings, Corporation Sole, Government Servant Status, Suspension Pending Enquiry, Quasi Judicial Orders, Power to Sanction Leases, Misconduct in Office
Administrative Law Service Law Constitutional Law Disciplinary Proceedings Corporation Sole Government Servant Status Suspension Pending Enquiry Quasi Judicial Orders +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S. Govinda Menon

Appellant

The Union of India

Respondent 1

State of Kerala

Respondent 2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Kerala High Court's Dismissal of Original Petition No. 1 of 1964

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether disciplinary proceedings can be taken against a government servant acting as corporation sole under Rule 4(1) of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955
  2. 2 Whether Commissioner’s decisions can be questioned only in appeal or revision under the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act XIX of 1951
  3. 3 Whether suspension under Rule 7(1) can be ordered only after framing charges under Rule 5(2)

Ratio Decidendi

Disciplinary proceedings may be validly initiated against a government servant acting as Commissioner, even if as a corporation sole, for acts or omissions which reflect upon integrity or duty. Suspension under Rule 7(1) may precede formal framing of charges. Commissioner has no authority to sanction leases without auction, nor to initiate lease proposals, and disciplinary action is not precluded by appellate remedies under the relevant statute.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs