S. KALADEVI versus V.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ORS.
The proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, allows an unregistered sale deed to be admitted as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance; therefore, the trial court erred in rejecting its admission and the High Court ought to have corrected this error.
- Parties
- Appellant: S. Kaladevi; Respondents: V.R. Somasundaram and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal From High Court Revision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Unregistered Sale Deed, Specific Performance, Collateral Transactions, Registration of Property Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. Kaladevi
Appellant
V.R. Somasundaram and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court on Appeal From High Court Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unregistered sale deed is admissible in evidence in a suit for specific performance of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, allows an unregistered sale deed to be admitted as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance; therefore, the trial court erred in rejecting its admission and the High Court ought to have corrected this error.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The order of the High Court dated 13.11.2008 and that of the trial court dated 11.12.2007 are set aside.
- The trial court shall mark the unregistered sale deed dated 27.2.2006 tendered by the plaintiff in her evidence and proceed with the suit accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment