S. NARAHARI RAO versus SATHYANARAYANA & ORS.
Since the main dispute before the Supreme Court has been decided, earlier orders of the High Court and trial court refusing temporary injunction for want of jurisdiction are set aside, and the matter is remitted to the trial court to decide the application for temporary injunction and the suit in accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment.
- Parties
- Appellant: S. Narahari Rao; Respondents: Sathyanarayana & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, on Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Orders of trial court and High Court set aside. Matter remitted to trial court for decision in light of Supreme Court judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunction, Remand, Status Quo Orders, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. Narahari Rao
Appellant
Sathyanarayana & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, on Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether application for temporary injunction could be decided by the City Civil Court of Bangalore while related matters were pending before the Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
Since the main dispute before the Supreme Court has been decided, earlier orders of the High Court and trial court refusing temporary injunction for want of jurisdiction are set aside, and the matter is remitted to the trial court to decide the application for temporary injunction and the suit in accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Orders of trial court and High Court set aside. Matter remitted to trial court for decision in light of Supreme Court judgment.
Orders
- Impugned orders dated 08.06.2009 (High Court) and 02.04.2009 (City Civil Court, Bangalore) set aside.
- Matter remanded to City Civil Court, Bangalore, to decide the application for temporary injunction and suit as per the judgment delivered in Civil Appeal Nos.3038 of 2007 and connected appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment