S. P. VASUDEVA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

S. P. VASUDEVA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

The appellant had no right to the post of Legal Assistant as his appointment was ad hoc/temporary. The order of reversion did not cast any stigma or constitute a measure of punishment, and therefore did not violate Article 311. Allegations of conspiracy or mala fides were not substantiated.

Parties
Appellant: S. P. Vasudeva; Respondents: State of Haryana & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
08 October 1975
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dismissing Writ Petition in Limine
Outcome
Appeal dismissed without costs.
Legal Topics
Reversion to Parent Department, Appointment on Ad Hoc/temporary Basis, Article 311 Protection, Punishment in Service Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S. P. Vasudeva

Appellant

State of Haryana & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dismissing Writ Petition in Limine

  1. 1 Whether reversion from a tenure post on ad hoc basis constitutes punishment under Article 311 of the Constitution of India
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had any right to the post from which he was reverted
  3. 3 Whether the order of reversion is vitiated by mala fides or amounts to a measure of punishment

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had no right to the post of Legal Assistant as his appointment was ad hoc/temporary. The order of reversion did not cast any stigma or constitute a measure of punishment, and therefore did not violate Article 311. Allegations of conspiracy or mala fides were not substantiated.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed without costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.