S.RAJAGOPAL CHETTIAR versus HAMASAVENI AMMAL AND ORS.
The testator's will made clear that the daughter was to enjoy the property absolutely during her lifetime, and after her, the property would devolve upon her male children. This negates any intention for absolute estate in the daughter; she only acquired a life estate, and Section 14(1) cannot be invoked as this ground was not raised in courts below or in the special leave petition.
- Parties
- Appellant: S. Rajagopal Chettiar; Respondents: Hamasa Veni Ammal and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Life Estate Vs Absolute Estate, Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, Appeal by Special Leave Under Article 136
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. Rajagopal Chettiar
Appellant
Hamasa Veni Ammal and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the daughter acquired a life estate or absolute estate under the will
- 2 Whether an argument not raised in courts below or in special leave petition can be raised for the first time during appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The testator's will made clear that the daughter was to enjoy the property absolutely during her lifetime, and after her, the property would devolve upon her male children. This negates any intention for absolute estate in the daughter; she only acquired a life estate, and Section 14(1) cannot be invoked as this ground was not raised in courts below or in the special leave petition.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment