S. S. MUNNA LAL versus S. S. RAJKUMAR AND OTHERS
A sonless Jain widow is entitled to adopt a son without express authority from her husband based on judicially recognized custom. The share in the joint family property declared in a preliminary decree in favour of a Hindu widow is 'possessed' by her within the meaning of section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and therefore vests absolutely in her. Upon her death, it devolves according to sections 15 and 16 of the Act, in this case upon her grandsons Munnalal and Ramchand to the exclusion of the adopted son Rajkumar.
- Parties
- Appellant: S. S. Munna Lal; Respondent: S. S. Rajkumar; Respondent: Ganpat Rai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption by Jain Widow Without Express Authority, Succession Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Partition of Joint Family Property, Rights of Female Hindu in Joint Family Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. S. Munna Lal
Appellant
S. S. Rajkumar
Respondent
Ganpat Rai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Madhya Pradesh High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sonless Jain widow can adopt a son without express authority from her husband.
- 2 Whether the share declared by a preliminary decree in favour of a Hindu widow is 'possessed' by her within the meaning of section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
- 3 Upon the widow’s death, how should her share devolve under the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
A sonless Jain widow is entitled to adopt a son without express authority from her husband based on judicially recognized custom. The share in the joint family property declared in a preliminary decree in favour of a Hindu widow is 'possessed' by her within the meaning of section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and therefore vests absolutely in her. Upon her death, it devolves according to sections 15 and 16 of the Act, in this case upon her grandsons Munnalal and Ramchand to the exclusion of the adopted son Rajkumar.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed.
Orders
- Decree of the High Court modified: share of Khilonabai devolved upon Munnalal and Ramchand; decree of the trial court restored regarding succession to Khilonabai’s share.
- No order as to costs in this appeal and in the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment