S.A. RASHEED versus DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY AND ANOTHER
The writ petition filed by the appellant suffered from unexplained laches and delay, as no sufficient explanation or documentary evidence was provided for the eight-year gap; in addition, issuance of a writ after expiry of the lease period for which grant was made would not be just and proper.
- Parties
- Appellant: S.A. Rasheed; Respondents: Director of Mines and Geology and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Karnataka High Court Judgment Dated 3.10.1991 in Wa.no. 1035 of 1991
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Laches and Delay, Quarrying Lease, Minor Mineral Concession, Writ Jurisdiction, Revocation of Grant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S.A. Rasheed
Appellant
Director of Mines and Geology and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Karnataka High Court Judgment Dated 3.10.1991 in Wa.no. 1035 of 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unexplained delay and laches bar relief under Article 226
- 2 Whether the right to execution of lease deed survives after expiry of lease period
- 3 Effect of Rule 3(A) and Rule 9(2) on grant and execution of quarrying lease
Ratio Decidendi
The writ petition filed by the appellant suffered from unexplained laches and delay, as no sufficient explanation or documentary evidence was provided for the eight-year gap; in addition, issuance of a writ after expiry of the lease period for which grant was made would not be just and proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment