SAVITRI GOENKA versus KUSUM LATA DAMANI AND ORS.
The impugned order is vitiated since notice was not served on the appellant and the practice of converting applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to one under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for bail has not been approved by the Supreme Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: SA Vitri Goenka; Respondent No. 1 (accused): Kusum Lata Damani; Respondents: Other Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Stage After High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed; impugned order set aside; matter remanded for fresh consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Propriety, Notice and Service, Bail, Interim Protection, Code of Criminal Procedure Sections 482 and 438
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SA Vitri Goenka
Appellant
Kusum Lata Damani
Respondent No. 1 (accused)
Other Respondents
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Stage After High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was proper in converting an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to one for bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. and granting interim protection without service on the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The impugned order is vitiated since notice was not served on the appellant and the practice of converting applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to one under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for bail has not been approved by the Supreme Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed; impugned order set aside; matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Orders
- Impugned order set aside.
- Parties directed to appear before High Court (Single Judge) on 23rd November, 2007 without further notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment