SACHIDA NAND SINGH AND ANR. versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
The bar contained in Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not applicable where forgery of the document was committed before its production in court. The provision should be strictly construed; thus, prosecutions for forgery committed outside and prior to court proceedings are not barred by this section.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sachida Nand Singh; Appellant: Second appellant; Respondent: State of Bihar; Respondent: Second respondent (Lal Narain Singh)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forgery, Bar of Prosecution Under Section 195 Cr PC, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sachida Nand Singh
Appellant
Second appellant
Appellant
State of Bihar
Respondent
Second respondent (Lal Narain Singh)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bar under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of CrPC applies to prosecution for forgery of a document produced in court if forgery occurred before production
- 2 Scope of Section 195 CrPC regarding prosecution of offences relating to documents produced in court
Ratio Decidendi
The bar contained in Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not applicable where forgery of the document was committed before its production in court. The provision should be strictly construed; thus, prosecutions for forgery committed outside and prior to court proceedings are not barred by this section.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment