SAJID KHAN versus L RAHMATHULLAH & ORS.
Where the recruiting authority, after scrutiny and on the basis of a prior clarification from the Directorate of Technical Education, treated Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as equivalent to Diploma in Electrical Engineering and there was no convincing material before the courts to show that the acceptance was illegal or arbitrary, courts should not set aside appointments; consequently the High Court and CAT orders setting aside the appointments were unsustainable and appeals by the appointed candidates were allowed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sajid Khan; Respondent(s): L Rahmathullah & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / On Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Equivalence of Qualifications, Qualification Prescribed in Notification, Judicial Review of Recruitment, Appointments and Selection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sajid Khan
Appellant
L Rahmathullah & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / On Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants' Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering met the qualification prescribed in the recruitment notification for Junior Engineer (Electrical) as equivalent to Diploma in Electrical Engineering
- 2 Whether the courts should interfere with the employer's decision recognizing equivalence of qualifications absent convincing evidence of arbitrariness
Ratio Decidendi
Where the recruiting authority, after scrutiny and on the basis of a prior clarification from the Directorate of Technical Education, treated Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as equivalent to Diploma in Electrical Engineering and there was no convincing material before the courts to show that the acceptance was illegal or arbitrary, courts should not set aside appointments; consequently the High Court and CAT orders setting aside the appointments were unsustainable and appeals by the appointed candidates were allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- Set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 20.11.2014 of the High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 15398 of 2010, 6014 of 2010, 14891 of 2010 and OP (CAT) No.1305 of 2010
- Allow the appeals by the appointed candidates (appellants) and uphold their selection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment