SAMARESH BOSE AND ANR. versus AMAL MITRA AND ANR.
The novel 'Prajapati' is not obscene within the meaning of section 292 IPC. Although portions of the book may use vulgar language and non-traditional literary forms, they do not have the effect of depraving or corrupting readers of any age. References to sex alone are not sufficient to render a literary work obscene. The conviction and sentence imposed by the courts below are set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Samaresh Bose; Appellant: Sitangshu Kumar Dasgupta; Respondent: Amal Mitra
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; appellants acquitted.
- Legal Topics
- Obscenity, Section 292 IPC, Freedom of Expression, Literary Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samaresh Bose
Appellant
Sitangshu Kumar Dasgupta
Appellant
Amal Mitra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the novel 'Prajapati' published in the journal 'Sarodiya Desh' is obscene within the meaning of section 292 IPC, attracting liability for the author, printer, and publisher.
Ratio Decidendi
The novel 'Prajapati' is not obscene within the meaning of section 292 IPC. Although portions of the book may use vulgar language and non-traditional literary forms, they do not have the effect of depraving or corrupting readers of any age. References to sex alone are not sufficient to render a literary work obscene. The conviction and sentence imposed by the courts below are set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; appellants acquitted.
Orders
- Conviction and sentence set aside.
- Fine, if paid, to be refunded to appellants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment