SAMPURAN SINGH AND ORS. versus NIRANJAN KAUR AND ORS.
Limitation for a suit to redeem an oral mortgage accrues from the date of execution if the mortgage is valid and there is no restriction to the contrary. Any acknowledgment after expiry of prescribed limitation cannot revive a fresh limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Redemption of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sampuran Singh and Ors.; Respondent: Niranjan Kaur and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redemption of Mortgage, Period of Limitation, Oral Mortgage Validity, Acknowledgement and Revival of Limitation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sampuran Singh and Ors.
Appellant
Niranjan Kaur and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral mortgage executed in 1893 is valid and legally enforceable
- 2 When does limitation for redemption and recovery of possession accrue in such cases
- 3 Whether Section 18 of the Limitation Act revives limitation due to acknowledgment after expiry
Ratio Decidendi
Limitation for a suit to redeem an oral mortgage accrues from the date of execution if the mortgage is valid and there is no restriction to the contrary. Any acknowledgment after expiry of prescribed limitation cannot revive a fresh limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Redemption of Mortgages (Punjab) Act, 1913 does not govern or affect the limitation period for redemption.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. Costs on the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment